Alfred
Hitchcock – auteur and creator
Those
French film critics believed that film directors could – and should – impose a
personal vision on their films. They argued that a director like Hitchcock
stamped a number of creative features on his films. Such as position of the
camera, specific shots to convey emotion, creative use of sound and complex
montage editing.
One way of
approaching the auteur theory is by identifying common threads and unique
themes that run through a director’s work, if it is possible to recognise the
director’s signature imprinted on a film in some ways mentioned above then it
may be possible to argue that the director qualifies for auteur status.
Steven
Spielberg if often quoted in this context. Many of his film plots are about
ordinary people having to confront the extra ordinary – ‘Jaws’ a small fishing
community and the local police confront a killer shark, ‘E.T’ a young boy makes
friends with an alien and has to help get him back to his home planet, and of
course ‘Schindler’s list’ a normal German factory owner stands up to the might
of the Nazi regime and manages to save over a 1000 Jews.
Hitchcock
was a very well known and well-respected director, both in the UK and US
specialising in mystery thrillers involving espionage, theft, plots, betrayal
and murder for both film and TV.
Hitchcock
believed that it was the director’s responsibility to trigger the audience’s
emotional and psychological response by what he called ‘pure film’. In order to
achieve this, he concentrated much of his attention on the preparation of his
films. He created elaborate storyboards and planned every camera position and
movement in painstaking detail.
So
what is Hitchcock’s ‘pure film’? Certainly all the elements mentioned above,
together with others designed to draw the audience right into the film’s
narrative and plot. Hitchcock’s main focus when creating a film was the effect
that it would have on the audience like any good director does – he paid close
attention to their reactions and this resulted in audiences watching with a
curious, prurient interest. We stand outside the narrative as observers, but
our emotions are engaged directly with the characters and actions, so we are
both subjective and objective participants within the action.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.