"How does the manipulation of narrative structure and narrative devices allow filmmakers to comment upon social issues at the time of production?"
The opening of Invasion of the Body Snatchers establishes
- to the audience - the protagonist, Miles Bennell. Through Miles, the audience
witnesses the activities of the growing ‘pod-people’ – our antagonists, shown
only through the protagonist’s view point and established sparingly in the film
as the ‘threat’ at the centre of its conflict. This limited or restricted
narrative, common in many different films of the genre and beyond, is
manipulated to suggest that Miles is actually irrational in his fears and what
we’re seeing isn’t actually happening.
This point is further expanded in the last scene, as
Miles desperately attempts to warn others of the pending invasion. Our
protagonist is now the minority in Santa Mira; with his fears easily explained
away by the pod-people to outsiders. The protagonists and antagonists have had
their roles reversed, so how can Miles (now raving, perhaps having suffered a
breakdown) be coupled with the unassuming and plain people of Santa Mira? He
occupies many of the conventions of an antagonist in this scene. To relate this
reversal to a social context, it draws comparison with the paranoia and
subsequent conformism of 1950s America in the face of McCarthyism at the time
of production on this film. The scene in question suggests that the
non-conformist in Miles, unwilling to shed his individuality for a cause he
doesn’t believe in, will be reduced to a small voice in a crowd of thousands. The
hero’s love interest is one of them now. This was the reality for many people,
especially in the Hollywood film industry at the time; he will be silenced by
the deafening voice of the new majority, including people they once held dear.
The narrative structure of Invasion of the Body Snatchers
is another point of manipulation, opting out of any sort of clear resolution.
Returning to the present time, Miles’ suspicions and mention of seed pods
coming out of Santa Mira ignites the police officer listening to alert the
proper authorities. They rush out and leave Miles, cowering against a wall as
the film ends. This ending lacks the finality and resolution of the mainstream
Hollywood science fiction film, instead leaving the audience with only the
thought that ‘perhaps’ the invasion will be halted. Will the authorities even
believe the police officer? Will the invasion be stopped? Who will win - humanity
or the pods? These questions remain unanswered in this adaptation. It’s
suggested that this conflict will be an on-going one, very similar to the
continuing Cold War and anti-communist agenda. The ending creates a connection
between the events of the film and real-world America, full of paranoia and
conformity; leaving the audience unfulfilled and uneasy, with many questions
after leaving the theatre.
Invasion of the Body Snatchers is filled with binary
oppositions, each relating vividly to the time of production on the film. The
opposition of humanity and love versus conformism and a lack of emotion is one
of the biggest, suggested by the scenes in the film showing a previously
trustworthy and dear character to Miles changed by the pod-people. The social
context of these scenes can be associated with the obedient filmmakers and
writers working in Hollywood in the 1950s, especially since the character Jack
Belicec is a working writer. They gave in to Senator Joseph McCarthy and outed
various industry people with anti-American sentiments in their films. Because
of their views, even the untrue ones, loved ones and family were willing to
work with McCarthy in ousting communism from the United States.
By manipulating the narrative structure and devices in
the film, the filmmakers have attempted to add a subtext to the final film
reflective of the political climate of the 1950s and paranoia induced film
industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.