The definition of comedy is mentioned first with the text suggesting that comedy has no conventions therefore the only way to define a film in the comedy genre is by it making people laugh, the text says:
"According to Brunovska Karnick and Jeniks (69) comedy has “no elements of setting and iconography that distinguish [it] as a genre. There is no plot structure that encompasses all comedies. Nor is there shared subject matter.”"
However, this article also shows how some critics have the opposite opinion:
"Roy Stafford argues that each genre uses “familiar ‘narrative devices’” – and as opposed to other critics he even defines those devices for comedy sufficiently. Stafford (2) explains that in comedy the audience responds to two different comic elements:
- “The Gag – visual, arual, verbal jokes, carefully timed and delivered for maximum impact;
- Comic situations – ‘narrative comedy’ in which it is the developing relationships between characters and the social environment that causes us to laugh
These two elements make a volatile combination since the performance of gags is often highly disruptive of the progression of the narrative.” "
The text concludes that "the most convincing definition of comedy is probably what we've suggested at the beginning: it makes people laugh." - I would agree with this conclusion as from personal experience with comedy films, I found it hard to notice similar conventions between each film in the comedy genre.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.