How important are film franchises for audiences and
producers?
Over the past 10 years audience have been proven to enjoy
more demanding experiences that franchises offer. From 2004 to 2015 franchises
have been the highest grossing movies at the box office, for example in 2013
Iron Man 3 earned over $1 billion worldwide, where as films such as Oblivion
staring two of the biggest film stars of all time (Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman)
just made over 200million at the box office worldwide. This example shows how over the past decade
audience have become more sophisticated in their film preferences and demand
more of an experience, an hour long film were the narrative ends when the film
does is no longer enough for Morden audiences. Now the audience wants more franchises
that last over a number of years to fulfil their needs. Another example to
support this would be that to understand the avengers the audience would need
to see films such as Iron man 3, this increases success for both franchises. A franchise is always the same with a hint of
new.
Franchises can also offer a ‘social experience’; the
audience going to the cinema to see a franchise see it as an event, they will
go with their friends who also enjoy the franchise, for example the franchise
‘Harry Potter’ was very popular in Cinema. Every time the next one was released
the audience who enjoyed the first film would go with their other friends who
enjoy the film.
The negatives of audiences and franchises are the lack of
choice in cinema; most franchises are extremely repetitive and insult the
audience’s intelligence. An example of this is the Spiderman trilogies. Two
trilogies have been released in the past ten years both doing extremely well at
the box office. Film studios keep giving or of the same and showing a lack of
creativity, by releasing re makes studios are falling into a creative vacuum. Sometimes
we are required to see two film
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.