How important are
film franchises for audiences and producers?
Audiences now have the opportunity to ‘go on a journey’ with
their favourite characters throughout the film sequel. For example, the Harry
Potter films show Harry growing from a young adolescent struggling with bullies
to eventually experiencing young love and love triangles. This allows the
audience of the same age to relate to Harry’s situations, ensuring they feel a
connection with the characters.
To meet the audience’s desires outside of the cinema there
have been Harry Potter theme parks built and there are many entertaining games
for every Potter Film made, expanding the audience even further. To many people
a film release date of Harry Potter is a cultural event that brings society together.
The social experience will be a national success with many screaming fans,
making it impossible to void the new film.
More over, the predictability of some films such as; Iron
Man, is the base of the audiences expectations so they know they will enjoy
future films (Iron Man 3). Iron Man 3 was a successful film proving that
audiences can build relationships with the characters and enjoy seeing the same
thing but bigger.
On the other hand, franchises can be seen as a negative for
the audience and producers. Although audiences enjoy watching an Iron Man 2 and
3, the predictability is giving us less and less of a choice every year. The
majority of films I researched from 2013 that were a hit in the box office were
Franchises. Evidently audiences are not
receiving anything new, however when we are provided an intellectual challenge
like Interstella it is a huge success. Interstella made an astonishing 2
million gross even though it was not a franchise.
The failure of the two Spiderman trilogies in the past ten
years proves that audiences can get tired of repetitive marketing. Each spider
man films gross declined more after every film. Some believe that the
ridiculously remade spider man films insulted the audience’s intelligence and
patronises their imagination.
Film Franchise can benefit the produces enormously.
Successful franchises have been known to guarantee the producers profits many
years after the films have been released. Although John Carter was a huge flop it
did not jeopardise Disney studios as the studio had profits from many other
films that were part of a franchise. If John Carter would have had a better
marketing scheme the could possibly of been a success. Therefore, Franchises
aim to perfect their marketing techniques. In order for a company to be cost
efficient they tend to not rely on set.
For example, the extremely popular Saw films were produced from a low
budget, with the only built set being the bathroom. The shooting budget was
$700,000 and the shooting was on a tight schedule.
Sequel’s with a specific genre is a positive factor when
producing film’s as you are able to deliver to the audience. Synergies run the risk of individual film
failure as then the franchise can’t successfully continue. Franchise failures
can lose businesses a significant amount of money. The Theme parks and
merchandises created in order to add to the films success will be a huge
investment of money down the drain.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.