Section A
6. How far should the films you have studied for this topic
be seen in relation to their particular time and place?
The films that I have studied for this topic are La Haine
and City of God. La Haine is a world cinema film made in France containing a
realistic representation of Paris and its social issues whereas City of God is
a mainstream Hollywood film which glamorises the problems within the favelas at
the time in which the film is set.
The opening of La Haine shows us real footage of the French
riots which were taking place during the early 90s due to racism and the
treatment of ethnic minorities in France. The first shot of La Haine makes the
audience view the police as antagonists as we see a shot from behind one
citizen looking over at a whole army of armed police officers all in the same
uniforms. This puts the audience behind the protagonist straight away as we are
also looking over at the army of police therefore we see the police as brutal
and immediately view them as antagonists. This puts us into the position of the
citizens and helps the audience to understand how the citizens living in the
projects felt towards the police and society. The mise-en-scene in this opening
sequence shows Paris as a war zone and challenges our expectations as, from
watching mainstream films, we are used to seeing Paris introduced as a very
cultural and beautiful city, for example in the opening of Amelie. In La
Haine’s opening sequence, we also see a firm bomb exploding which reflects
Hubert’s apocalyptic view of the world and shows how the young people of the
projects in Paris have a very negative world view. This montage of actual riot
footage as the opening sequence grounds the film in reality and creates a
‘realist framework’ that the film takes place within and helps to set a realistic
idea of the time and place that the film is set in.
City of God’s opening shows us an incomplete project with
positive intentions where we see children running around in a large open space
from a wide shot. This shot shows clean land with a sense of community and
optimism under a golden high key light. The only crime we see in this opening
sequence is crime with reason and small crimes such as theft. This opening
sequence tells us that this project started off with positive intentions
whereas in La Haine we are taken straight to the negativity of Las Banlieues
where we presume the shanty towns were purposely built for the non-French
citizens to be separated from the French living further into the centre of
Paris. From this, I think that La Haine should be seen more in relation to its
particular time and place than City of God as we are given background knowledge
in the opening of City of God however La Haine is hard to understand if the
audience are not French or have no prior knowledge of the French riots or
projects in Paris.
A common convention for mainstream crime films is the
glorification of the rise and fall of a particular criminal, this is evident in
City of God as we watch Lil Ze gradually gain power as his obsession with
killing grows and his drug company becomes richer. We then see the fall of Lil Ze when the crime
has spread across the favelas and the runts kill him. This crime film
convention does not occur in La Haine, instead we never see the trio rise
therefore they are never able to fall, this shows that they have never been of
importance in their society and have never held any sort of power over the
police or the French citizens. From this, it is clear that City of God is more
about gang wars therefore the time and place is not so important, whereas La
Haine constantly comments on social issues and the ways in which the non-French
people living in the projects of Paris felt during the riots.
Another convention used in crime films is exotic locales which
often add an element of adventure and wealth. In City of God, we see this in
the club scene where the people of the favelas are partying and dancing showing
the benefits of crime and power in a poverty stricken area. On the other hand,
La Haine shows the centre of Paris as a dangerous place for the trio rather
than an exotic and exciting place, this helps us to view Paris from a
non-French citizen’s point of view and really makes the audience think about
the location of the film as they are used to seeing this place represented as
romantic.
Both City of God and La Haine adopt a circular narrative to
comment upon social issues in their countries. The director of La Haine uses a
circular narrative to comment upon issues in French society as it shows how the
“non-French” citizens are trapped within this criminal society. This film ends
with a gun sound however it isn’t clear whether it was Hurbert or the police
officer who was killed therefore this film has no resolution as there is no
resolution for the people living in the projects as the riots never change how
the “non-French” are viewed or treated. For City of God, this type of narrative
is used to portray the cycle of violence within the favelas and isn’t used to
comment upon the social issues in the time or place of the film’s setting
therefore we know that La Haine should be seen more in relation to its time and
place than City of God.
Furthermore, La Haine has a continuous, linear narrative
which contributes to its realism, whereas City of God has a disrupted
non-linear narrative as it is more of a representation of the time and place
than La Haine is. Moreover, La Haine is set over 24 hours to show these things
happen on a daily basis, they are not rare occasions, although City of God is
set over 15-20 years as it shows a full cycle of violence and a full decline of
the City of God. From this, it is clear that La Haine has a much more specific
time in which the film is set which is important as it helps to put across a
message about the social issues in Paris at this time.
La Haine ends with the death of Said and with the death of
either Hubert or the police officer showing the non-French citizens losing
their conflict against the police, whereas the City of God ends with Rocket
escaping the favelas and gaining a career. Although, the characters of both
films want to escape their shanty towns, it is only the City of God character
that manages to do so showing that La Haine is a more realistic representation
of Paris and its social issues at the time whereas City of God is more about
the story of Rocket and his life in the favelas over the years.
In conclusion, both films use narrative and conventions to
comment upon power, poverty and conflict in their countries however La Haine is
a much more realistic representation of this therefore more attention needs to
be paid to the time and location of La Haine in comparison to City of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.