Re-cap report
The article is written by
Steve Neale and appeared in a book called Genre and Hollywood
This text tells me about
different books which focus on genre and how the authors of the books have
interpreted the comedy genre with links to social issues.
The text says that since the
days of Chaplin, the frameworks of concern ‘tended to focus on issues of
aesthetic integrity, self-expression and direct or indirect social and cultural
worth’.
However, in more recent books
the focus has changed, the text says ‘aesthetics, evaluation and socio-cultural
issues are by no means absent from more recent books. But the agendas within
which they are working are in general rather different from those governing
earlier writing and research. They include feminism, gender and sexual
politics; structuralism, semiotics, post-structuralism and psychoanalysis;
cultural studies, race and ethnicity; and the 1980s turn towards archival and
historical research.’ – important because I can see which social issues are apparent
in more recent comic films compared to earlier comic films.
This text also talks about the
conventions of comedy ‘comedy can also entail an array of defining conventions
(from the generation of laughter to the presence of happy endings to the
representation of everyday life)’ – the only way of defining comedy as a whole
is making people laugh.
‘most discussions of comedy
being by acknowledging a basic distinction between what might be called its
comic units – gags, jokes funny moments and the like – and the narrative and
non-narrative contexts in which they occur.’
The second resource I used
was a Laurel and Hardy silent film called “From Soup to Nuts’
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.